|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Salene Gralois
K-2
   |
Posted - 2011.03.30 13:23:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Salene Gralois on 30/03/2011 13:25:17
 Originally by: Roelof Kremer
"edit"
and English is not my native tongue/language
We know. You're Dutch. So is Malcorian. And you've both slipped up the same with using dutch words in forum-posts in the past.
It is also interesting to note that, out of all the belgians and dutch people i chat with, you and Malcorian are the only ones i've read so far who don't correct
themselves after making such an error.
[Edit]Damnit. I thought i was in their other thread. Sorry to bring this pile of trash back to the frontpage  [/Edit]
|
Salene Gralois
K-2
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 13:44:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Didn't notice i used dutch words in the form.
Some one did already notice i use Englisch words at a Dutch form.
I don't care what you do on those other forums. Moot point. Try again.
|
Salene Gralois
K-2
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 14:09:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Originally by: Salene Gralois
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Didn't notice i used dutch words in the form.
Some one did already notice i use Englisch words at a Dutch form.
I don't care what you do on those other forums. Moot point. Try again.
I don't realy get this reply/post. ,... (?)
Still i asked Malcorian if he did know dutch. I asked him in dutch. He didn't understand,....
It means: Your argument is void.
And: Sure you did. You've been most trustworthy so far 
|
Salene Gralois
K-2
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 14:34:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Ik now what it means. I just don't get the reply/post.
I was just saying that i didn't notice i used dutch words at a englisch form.
Some one did already notice is used englisch words at a dutch form.
Maybe i gorgot to add that i mix the 2 up a little.
And now that you pointed it out. And i know. I hope to notice it myself and edit it when i do.
Your post suggested it shouldn't be a big deal as you also use english words on a dutch forum.
Your argument was void for 3 reasons:
1) just about every dutch person does that occasionally.
2) what you do on other forums has no relevance to what you post on this forum
3) Dutch people don't point out you've used an english word, their language is riddled with them.
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Originally by: Salene Gralois
It means: Your argument is void.
And: Sure you did. You've been most trustworthy so far
Dit i do something untrustworthy?
Just asking,...
I don't know, i was just saying. You tell me :)
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Also this is getting a little offtopic.
Yep.
|
Salene Gralois
K-2
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 14:55:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
I don't own any bpo's. And never did own any bpo's. Nothing to return
That's a bit random, what does that have to do with anything? |
Salene Gralois
K-2
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 15:10:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Originally by: Salene Gralois
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
I don't own any bpo's. And never did own any bpo's. Nothing to return
That's a bit random, what does that have to do with anything?
i noticed some talking about bpo's and honest players that returned them.
Ok, that makes sense, sort of. But why did you pick bpo's to illustrate you are not untrustworthy?
|
Salene Gralois
K-2
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 16:21:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Roelof Kremer
Random thinking. I just remember a post about the bpo's And a honest player that returnd them.
Some players then posted he is realy honest and trustworthy.
Other then that. not sure why i pick bpo's to illustrate.
That's why i'm asking. You use that example to imply trustworthyness, but it in no way applies to you as you've never owned any.
There's absolutely no logic or causal relation in your argument.
|
|
|
| |
|